PLEASE FIRST READ DISCLAIMER
AT BOTTOM*
NOTE:- Advise available for all countries laws vis-a-vis adultery & divorce so if you want divorce from your adulterous wife & want to have Consultation with ATUR CHATUR by paying him the consultation fees then contact him at +91-9873540498 & must also leave an email at ATURCHATUR@YAHOO.COM
TAX
EVASION PETITION
by a
Friend named SRINI
I gave these list of
Docs as evidences in my TEP against Father In Law: All got legally through
RTI.
1 Copy of previous
"Tax Evasion Petition" complaint dated XXXXXX
2 Copy of BBMP notice
with reference no XXXXXX dated XXXX (Prooving that he runs a Hotel without
Licenses)
3 PAN Card copy of
Mr.FIL bearing PAN no: AEXXXXXXXXN
4 Copy of Sanctioned
Plan bearing LP no:XXX/XX-XX dated XX/XX/XXXX
5 Actual Photographs
of the Property
6 Copy of ownership
proof bearing New PID no: XX-XXX/X
7 Property Tax paid
information for New PID no: XX-XXX/X
8 Tax paid details
from Municipal Department, AREA NAME
9 Receipt for the
year 2014-2015 from BBMP
10 Tender agreement
B/W GOVT DEPT and M/S FIL's FIRM(Bills paid for more than
22lakhs, may have
been concealed from IT n ST)
11 Vijaya Bank,
Statement of M/S FIL's FIRM bearing A/C no:
1XXXXXXXXXXX(Transfered
money to his son's A/C from a current a/c which needs
explanation)
12 SBM, statement of
Mr.FIL, bearing A/c no: 1XXXXXXXXXXX(Transfered money to
his son's A/C from a
current a/c which needs explanation)
13 SBM, statement of
Mr.BIL, bearing A/c no: 1XXXXXXXXXXX(Huge transaction, no
source of income
specified)
14 B-Extract from
RTO, Central for the Vehicle KA-XX XX XXXX(proves that they
bought car in
full-cash)
15 Gold & Silver
articles Purchase Receipts numbered 26 to 47
IT inspector sent for
asking for their statement and proofs for all these things, now inlaws are running behind IT
dept.
Regards
Srini
Also check :-
CIC/LS/A/2009/001179 18.02.2010
It is to be noted that investigation into a TEP cannot be allowed to go on ad-infinitum and that it should be concluded in a reasonable time frame where after the broad outcome thereof needs to be communicated to the appellant i.e. whether the allegations made in the TEP are fully true, partially true or untrue.
CIC/LS/A/2009/000386 19.1.2010
The CPIO, therefore, is directed to disclose the following information to the appellant :- (i) Whether or not Shri Baljinder Singh has filed Income Tax Returns, for the years 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2007-08. No details, however, need to be supplied. (ii) If, it is true that the appellant had filed a tax evasion petition in respect of Shri Baljinder Singh, and if the investigation has been completed, the broad outcome thereof, (that is, whether it has been found to be fully true or partially true or false) should be disclosed to the appellant.
TEP should finish within 3 months,
CIC :: File No.CIC/LS/A/2009/001113 Appellant : Shri Chetan Anand Parashar Date of Decision : 19.2.2010
held as follows :-
7.In view of the above discussion, the decisions of CPIO and AA in regard to non disclosure of ITRs are upheld. Even so, the CPIO is directed to intimate the outcome of TEP to the appellant in 03 months time.
In another decision dated 18.02.2010 in Virag R Dhulia Vs IT Department, Kolkatta File No.CIC/LS/A/2009/001179, the single Bench headed by the undersigned had held as follows :
“……………(6)In view of the above, Income Tax Office, Ward No.31(3), 20, BC Middleton Row, Kolkatta – 700017 is hereby directed to complete the investigation in next three months time and intimate the broad outcome thereof, as indicated herein above, to the appellant in three months time.
Judgment is available on aturchatur@yahoo.com
Also check :-
CIC/LS/A/2009/001179 18.02.2010
It is to be noted that investigation into a TEP cannot be allowed to go on ad-infinitum and that it should be concluded in a reasonable time frame where after the broad outcome thereof needs to be communicated to the appellant i.e. whether the allegations made in the TEP are fully true, partially true or untrue.
CIC/LS/A/2009/000386 19.1.2010
The CPIO, therefore, is directed to disclose the following information to the appellant :- (i) Whether or not Shri Baljinder Singh has filed Income Tax Returns, for the years 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2007-08. No details, however, need to be supplied. (ii) If, it is true that the appellant had filed a tax evasion petition in respect of Shri Baljinder Singh, and if the investigation has been completed, the broad outcome thereof, (that is, whether it has been found to be fully true or partially true or false) should be disclosed to the appellant.
TEP should finish within 3 months,
CIC :: File No.CIC/LS/A/2009/001113 Appellant : Shri Chetan Anand Parashar Date of Decision : 19.2.2010
held as follows :-
7.In view of the above discussion, the decisions of CPIO and AA in regard to non disclosure of ITRs are upheld. Even so, the CPIO is directed to intimate the outcome of TEP to the appellant in 03 months time.
In another decision dated 18.02.2010 in Virag R Dhulia Vs IT Department, Kolkatta File No.CIC/LS/A/2009/001179, the single Bench headed by the undersigned had held as follows :
“……………(6)In view of the above, Income Tax Office, Ward No.31(3), 20, BC Middleton Row, Kolkatta – 700017 is hereby directed to complete the investigation in next three months time and intimate the broad outcome thereof, as indicated herein above, to the appellant in three months time.
Judgment is available on aturchatur@yahoo.com
Mahatma
Gandhi said, "IF YOU DON'T ASK, YOU DON'T GET"
Atur Chatur says, "WHAT
YOU WILL ASK, THAT YOU WILL GET"
Hope this will help you
guys....................all the best
Issued in Public Interest by
ATUR CHATUR COUNSELLING *
शादी से पहले और शादी के बाद
ATUR CHATUR को रखना याद
ATUR CHATUR को रखना याद
Email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com
DISCLAIMER & TERMS &
CONDITIONS
*Disclaimer:-
Atur Chatur is my pen name. I am Delhi University Ex-Lecturer. I am NOT a
lawyer. I am a PIP (Party-in-Person). I filed Perjury (fraud on court) on lies
of my wife with proofs. I filed court case against Police/CAW. I filed
complaint against Judge Family Court (JFC) due to unethical practices/ gender
discrimination which resulted in JFC Recusal. I also became a RTI Activist. I
acquired all other knowledge/info after false 498a/DVC/Divorce/ CAW cases were
filed against me & entire family & my income greatly affected so I have
chosen this profession to support my family & also to support my one man
fight against gender discrimination in India. Counselling Fees = 2,000 only for
approx one hour talking to you & suggesting you few methods like RTI or
other methods which is based on my knowledge which I acquired while fighting
false cases. Fees is subject to change due to urgency & other factors so
please confirm. I do not provide legal opinion/ legal advise or anything like
that. All written by me & my suggestions etc is my personal views. You
yourself will be responsible for acting on any of my counseling/ advises /
consult / guidance etc. Fees for the RTI & any other writing work is to be
paid separately & does not come under counselling fees. Pls ask the fees
before getting any work done. Fees once paid (even if paid in excess) are not
refundable under any circumstances. I do not provide legal opinion/ legal
advise or anything like that. All written by me & views/ writings/ RTI/
suggestions/ counselling guidance etc are my personal views. You yourself will
be responsible for acting on any of my counselling/ advises / consult / guidance
etc. The author and his family haven't bribed any public official nor have they
given in to the extortion. This blog aims to raise awareness of due process in
India. The content of this blog constitutes, opinions, observations, and
publicly available documents. The intent is not to slander or defame anyone or
any institution and is the manifestation of the author's right to freedom of
expression – with all the protections this right guarantees. There has been no
advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement
of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work
through this website. The user wishes to gain more information about us for
his/her own information and use. The information about us is provided to the
user only his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials
downloaded from this website is completely at the user's volition and any
transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client
relationship. The information provided under this website is solely available
at your request for information purposed only, should not be interpreted as
soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any
action taken by the user relying on legal material/information provided under
this website. In cases where the user has any legal dowry consultation issues,
he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice from his own reliable sources & contacts.
Disputes if any shall be subject to Delhi Jurisdiction only. General Disclaimer
applies.
